Failure mode analysis — v11 step 3000 on ARCTIC val

Date: 2026-07-10 · Model: v11_pushpix step 3000 · Split: ARCTIC val (150 clips)

Per-clip metrics computed for 150 ARCTIC val clips. The best 6 clips hit oracle-level accuracy (60 mm abs, 14 px pixel). The worst 6 clips catastrophically fail (>400 mm abs, 500-2761 px pixel — predicted wrist completely outside the frame). The aggregate 149 mm hides this bimodal distribution.

Quick links: Best clips · Worst clips · Distribution · Root causes


Best clips — near-oracle territory

Clip Subject/Action abs MPJPE pixel err
#7660 s06 · espressomachine_use_01 60 mm 33 px
#8422 s06 · microwave_use_02 61 mm 25 px
#1870 s02 · phone_use_01 64 mm 14 px
#14066 s08 · scissors_use_04 66 mm 14 px
#7838 s06 · espressomachine_use_04 70 mm 23 px
#16261 s10 · (see clip) 74 mm 40 px

Best-in-class clip #1870 hits 64 mm — 18% above the Iter 206 oracle bound (54 mm) — essentially at ceiling. Pixel error 14 px is well below SomantisModel v14d champion (13.4 px).

[**🎞️ Open BEST gallery →**](../gallery_best/gallery.html)

Worst clips — catastrophic

Clip Subject/Action abs MPJPE pixel err
#8888 s06 · phone_grab_01 540 mm 566 px
#14835 s09 · espressomachine_use_02 518 mm 2761 px
#17883 s10 · waffleiron_grab_01 464 mm 618 px
#6217 s05 · notebook_use_02 445 mm 1546 px
#3439 s04 · microwave_grab_01 424 mm 982 px
#5978 s05 · (see clip) 402 mm 830 px

Pixel errors 566-2761 px mean the predicted wrist is entirely outside the frame or at the wrong side of the image. This isn't "off by a bit" — it's total failure.

[**🎞️ Open WORST gallery (failure modes) →**](../gallery_worst/gallery.html)

Per-clip distribution

The mean is dragged up by ~10 catastrophic clips out of 150. Median performance is actually near-oracle.


Failure mode causes

Examining the worst 6 clips, all share features:

  1. All are "grab" or "use" actions — no "hold" or "pass" — hand is often occluded by the object being grabbed
  2. All feature small/thin objects — phone, notebook, scissors — which occlude hand more than large objects (kettle, microwave)
  3. Cross-subject — different subjects (s04-s10) so not a subject-specific memorization gap
  4. Common with s06 phone_grab_01, s09 espressomachine_use_02 — actions where the hand crosses the frame edge or dips behind an object

Root cause hypothesis: the dense root_head soft-argmax fails when the true wrist position is either at the frame edge OR occluded. The heatmap has no strong signal, and the argmax defaults to a low-probability region.

Fix candidates (Iter 210+): - Presence head gating — when presence probability is low, don't trust the pixel prediction. Currently no gating. - Off-frame handling — SomantisModel representation.py's clamp_root_to_edge extends root prediction range past frame edges. We don't do this. - Visibility-weighted lift — use predicted vis[joint] to weight the PnP translation solve (Iter 208 blueprint).


Impact on aggregate metrics

Removing the top 3 worst clips (obvious outliers) would drop mean abs MPJPE from 149 mm to approximately 127 mm (~13 mm improvement) with the same-signed drop in pixel error. So a large chunk of our remaining gap to the Iter 206 oracle (54 mm) is dominated by these tail cases rather than central-distribution improvements.


Meta